Jonathan Taylor, the star running back for the Indianapolis Colts, has found himself in a difficult position. After leading the NFL in rushing in 2021, Taylor had hoped for a lucrative contract extension. However, owner Jim Irsay has been vocal about his belief that running backs are underpaid, making it clear that Taylor’s desired extension was not going to happen anytime soon. Frustrated with the situation, Taylor has expressed his desire to be traded, signaling a possible end to his days with the Colts.
A Growing Number of Unhappy Running Backs
Taylor is not alone in his dissatisfaction with his contract situation. Many running backs in the league believe that their position should be better compensated. This growing sentiment among running backs highlights the ongoing debate about the value of the position and the financial expectations of players. Taylor’s request for a trade reflects the broader discontent among running backs in the NFL.
The tension between Taylor and the Colts has been brewing for quite some time. According to multiple sources, Taylor has been increasingly frustrated with his situation. His agent, Malki Kawa, tweeted about the strained relationship between the Colts and Taylor, indicating that a resolution may be difficult to achieve. Furthermore, Kawa stated that it is “bad faith” not to pay your top offensive player, further adding fuel to the fire. The relationship between Taylor and the Colts appears to be at an all-time low.
Ankle Injury and Uncertain Return
Adding to the uncertainty surrounding Taylor’s future with the Colts is the decision to place him on the Physically Unable to Perform (PUP) list. This designation prohibits Taylor from practicing until he is activated. While Taylor had surgery on his right ankle earlier in the offseason, Colts owner Jim Irsay had previously stated that he was “healed up.” The conflicting information surrounding Taylor’s injury and his potential return only serves to exacerbate the frustration between the player and the team.
The Trade Market for Taylor
The Colts, if they decide to entertain trade offers for Taylor, will likely be seeking an early-round draft pick in return. However, in the current NFL climate, where the value of running backs is debated, it may be challenging for the Colts to find a suitor willing to give up significant draft capital for Taylor. The recent trades involving other players, such as Dalvin Cook and Stephon Gilmore, have not fetched optimal value for the Colts, potentially further complicating a potential trade involving Taylor.
Impact on the Colts’ Offense
Taylor’s absence would undoubtedly have a significant impact on the Colts’ offense. With quarterback Carson Wentz and rookie running back Trey Richardson, the Colts had hoped to establish a formidable running game. Taylor’s big-play ability and his rapport with the offensive line would have been a valuable asset for the Colts, keeping defenses honest and potentially freezing linebackers. Even if Taylor were to return to the lineup, the lack of practice time with Richardson and the offensive line would not be ideal.
The Case for a Lucrative Deal
Despite the challenges in finding a trade partner, Taylor’s performance on the field makes a strong case for a lucrative contract. Still only 24 years old, Taylor has already proven himself as one of the best backs in football. His explosive big-play ability warrants a deal that surpasses the benchmark set by the franchise tag, which is $10.1 million per year. The question remains whether any team would be willing to both trade for Taylor and offer him a significant contract in the current running back climate.
Jonathan Taylor’s future with the Indianapolis Colts hangs in the balance. Frustrated by the lack of a contract extension, Taylor has requested a trade. However, the uncertain trade market for running backs and the Colts’ reluctance to part ways with their star player add to the complexity of the situation. As the drama unfolds, fans are left wondering whether Taylor will stay with the Colts or embark on a new chapter of his career elsewhere.